The superb subconscious data processor prints answers out in emotion code

A human being is a massively impressive processor of information. Everything that we see, hear, feel, think creates a mass of data that through mainly subconscious processing prints out an emotional response. Most of us are not able to consciously process the wealth of emotion that we take in every second, and that is why our emotional output seems illogical to our conscious mind that is only capable of processing a fraction of the data that your subconscious processor is able to process. People differ from animals in that we are attempting to create a consciousness that is able to do this processing on a conscious level more and more accurately, whilst most animals rely steadily on the subconscious data processing alone: “Does it feel good?” “Yes.” “Then it’s good.” When we started to process this data consciously, we started processing fragmented information that created a result that didn’t match the emotional result, but because we are completely aware of the mental process that handles aware information, we discarded the results that we received from the subconscious processor and relied heavily upon the information the lacking, cumbersome concious processor that gave us a result that to us seemed more reliable because we understood where it came from.

Spiritualists, scientists and philosophers and the like are trying to develop the conscious processor of this data to match the capabilities of the much more advanced subconscious processor. The consciousness is “newer technology”, but it is nowhere near as powerful as the old technology is – but it has it’s benefits; it creates more joy, different ways of existing, different forms of expression, higher capacity to enjoy whatever it is that you are experiencing, and that is why the development of this new processor is worth while.

Your aim as a developer of your dual processor of your being is to match your conscious conclusion to that of your emotional conclusion. Your emotional conclusion is without much of a doubt the exact right one. Your anger didn’t come out of nowhere even if your conscious processor doesn’t know where it came from, it came as a product of a logical but subconscious analysation of information you didn’t even know you had. You pick up data all the time without realising, and your subconscious puts this data together and delivers a result without fail: “Do not trust this person.” Your gut feeling knows that a person is not trustworthy, but your newly developed aware data processor is still crunching numbers trying to figure out why. What to do: Don’t trust the person and give your conscious mind time to catch up to figure out why exactly you felt this way. There is ALWAYS a reason.

A rat who has seen another rat eat poison and die won’t touch poison. This hardly means that this rat knows poison to be poison intellectually, but it has an experience watching another rat die from eating poison resulting to a subconscious decision that this is a bad idea. The subconscious of the rat gives it an output: “Bad stuff happens if you eat that.” A rat, who has witnessed another rat die from slowly working poison; undetectable from the rat’s point of view would only learn that other rats die. BOTH of our processors are still reliant of the information that we have had access to. We do not manufacture experience, it is what it is. Also, we put a lot more weight to personal experience than what we put on second hand experience, such as stories or movies, even though they are likely very powerful experiences to someone else and very important in their decision making process, both consciously and subconsciously. However, if we notice that our friends react with fear to someone or something, even if we didn’t know why they are afraid, we trust our subconscious data that informs us that “they are afraid” and that must mean they have a reason to be afraid.

In modern times we tell scary stories to each other all the time. Now, the aware, concious mind is overriding the subconscious data. It is creating a NEW warning label: “They tell me to be afraid, therefore I am afraid.” This is intensified with the other’s reaction, those of us who believe the conscious information to be more true than the subconscious information is. The other reacts with fear and doubt to cognitive information, and even if we were completely in tune with our more accurate subconscious processor, we still pick up their genuine subconscious fear and tell ourselves: “They are afraid of X for a good reason.” It is to our benefit to learn and pay attention to other’s fears, because we so often have a chance to make one mistake only before we’re dead.

The way that my brain works now is that I take in data through both the channels and combine them with a dual processor that is no longer two separate processors but work in parallel to each other. My conscious processor can analyse the data of the subconscious without getting confused, and the emotional processor checks the conscious processor for errors all the time. If my subconscious processor puts up a red flag to notify me of an error, I go back and feed the new data on the conscious processor for a better, more accurate output. My emotional checker is still the more powerful one, but the rational, conscious processor is trying to interfere a lot when confronted with other people’s conscious processor data. Ie. “I don’t believe your gut feeling is right. I believe my husband left me because he is a bad man” is an excellent example of conscious data that has ignored a good deal of subconscious material, but which sounds convincing because the person saying it is missing data and experience base.

The vaster our experience base that we are both subconsciously and consciously aware of – the comparative database – we have, the better results we can get to in our conscious output. Some of that experience data is stored in the soul memory and consists of life times spent before this one. All that experience is still usable and valuable to us during our lives, and explains some of the differences in our cognitive and emotional abilities. Our soul hold both the conscious and subconscious processors, but it is our brain that receives that information and interprets it in the physical form.

Information bias is a known psychological phenomena, in which we tend to favour information that we already think to be true. This is a result of the information database that we hold within ourselves. If we have heard 100 spiritualists say the goal of life is to achieve oneness and a non-physical immortality, it takes 101 to make us reconsider it. We are subconsciously counting votes for two ways of looking at things, IF we are incapable or unwilling to do the thinking behind the claim ourselves, especially if we value the opinion of these people the same compared to each other, and that value judgement is of course a result of countless calculations of different types that I couldn’t even begin to describe intellectually.

If you find it exciting to develop your ability to dual processing all information, pay special attention to your emotions and decide to make this a conscious process. Be constantly aware of your current emotional state and keep track of where the emotional diggers occur. (This is only a decision. Thought and awareness doesn’t need to be draining, you simply decide to pay attention. It starts becoming easier in time, it’s like physical exercise, at first it feels insurmountable, and the next thing you know you’re running up a mountain… Okay, you do have to WANT to do it.) As you collect data, try to intellectually trace back the logical conclusions of the situation that your subconscious has already made, and teach your awareness to make a note of these pathways. The more sense your emotions start to make to you, the closer of true awareness you have developed your thinking. (And if you are now tempted to tell me that you are already fully aware, I’ll ask you a question in which you don’t know the answer to only to prove that you have no idea. 😉 Complete awareness is something humans haven’t got the brain power to achieve yet, but at least some of us are aware enough to know that much. 😉 ) Many people still runs two processors at the same time without cross checking the data. Many choose one over the other, and decide only to trust information from the intellectual processor, rarely completely normal people rely entirely on the emotional processor. Most run both at the same time, but not really know how to combine the data into one logical output that makes sense to the intellectual side of us. That is the goal that a completely aware person should have; how to combine and read the data of the two processors simultaneously.

Put that into your brain and process it.

Subscribe to get a Daily Message