Gender Bias Against Men

We are all more than familiar with all the ways that women get mistreated and pushed aside… But nobody talks about the real gender bias, that MORE THAN OFTEN is about gender bias that goes AGAINST men.

When two equal candidates are applying for the same job these days, the chances are that the vote is going to swing her side, simply because the employer doesn’t want to seem sexist. Even MORE often, I would be ready to bet, if a less qualified female candidate and a clearly more capable male candidate are applying for the same job, the choice again favors the female, because the employer doesn’t want a sexist label, and also they feel they have to “rescue” the woman, while the man can take care of himself. Further, it is more than possible that people fear they are being gender biassed against women if they think the male is better for the job, so they, just to be on the safe side, choose the female candidate, that they actually realize is less capable than the male.

Also, what is easy to see by anyone who wants to see the truth rather what they are supposed to see, is the fact that women DO NOT demand as much of themselves as men do. They simply don’t. In many cases, they do not see the difference between a capable man and themselves, especially if, on paper, they had the same qualifications, qualifications which she, more than likely, received as a result of another gender-based nod towards the female gender, while cranking down on the males. No wonder people do not take women seriously, we KNOW women are being left in by the back door and by other means that will push more capable men out and more advantage-demanding women in, causing an unbalanced workforce and a need for loading one person with other people’s work, particularly obvious in work environments manned by women; the one woman who is capable will do the work of 10 others, while the other happily pretend to be doing just as much as the capable one, or the assumption that they should do as well as her is an unfair one. (Logic?!) This is STILL a hang up from the time when a lady was not questioned or criticized, and a gentleman was expected to take the fault of a lady’s mistake… Men STILL do that, and women count on it. On the top of that, women expect other women to always have their back, and any woman that goes against other women is seen as an enemy and a “non-female” or “a man-pleaser” or something else that is equally condemnable, slut or a whore included.

Also, women are in the liberty of organizing clubs and opportunities for women only.  Men do not have the same kind of a liberty, socially speaking. It seems that women get suspicious of men as soon as women are excluded out of something, as if the only possible reason for men to want to hang out together would be plotting against women and how to make it so that women will never rise in this society, as if we were all tied in some juvenile game of girls vs. boys… (“Aren’t you doing that now, yourself?” I can already hear them ask.) Perhaps it is simply a testament on how women think, after all when you point a finger at someone, there is three pointing right back at yourself; when you accuse someone of doing A, it is likely that in their shoes, you’d do what you suspect the other one of doing, whether they are actually doing it or not. And, there is no doubt a lot of women’s organizations have no other function than to make sure women get an advantage over men… An advantage, that they so often confuse for something they call “an equal opportunity”. (“They”. I have habit of talking about women as if I wasn’t one of them because I have never felt like one of the women nor do I wish to – it’s a group of people I do not wish to be directly associated with ideologically, even if that is my own gender.) Whenever women demand “an equal opportunity” make sure she doesn’t mean that she needs a step ladder because she knows the man is, actually, better at his job than she is. The early feminism didn’t mean that women were supposed to be given step ladders, what it meant was that a woman was not to be barred out of the work force on the grounds of her being a female, especially when men less capable than her were given the opportunity based on their gender. Equality MUST MEAN that women, just like men, have to prove their worth, and are given the opportunity to do so, not that women are given a disproportionate opportunities or salaries that match up to those of men regardless of her failure to perform the same as the male.

When a woman decides to take an issue with a man for any reason, the chances are that she gets a lot of support to her cause simply because it’s a “David vs. Goliath” situation, based on nothing but gender bias; the tiny woman against this terrifying creature called “a man”. If he defends himself, he’s seen as a chauvinist, if another man defends him, it’s said to be “a boys club” and if a woman defends him, he’s seen as “a pussy hiding behind a woman’s back”. There is NOTHING a man can say in a controversial situation that doesn’t somehow land him in the s***.. A woman may be called “a bitch” but that is hardly a put-down but it contains praise: “independent, strong”. The man, in order to maintain his stance in society, must give in on all accounts and be told what to say, do, or think. Once he learns to do that without putting up a fight, he will be called “spineless”. Women were silenced in a similar manner in the Victorian era: if she spoke out she “wasn’t a real lady”.

If someone defends a man against false physical abuse claims made against him, feminists will shut his defendants down by calling it “victim blaming” even when the victim in question is psychologically MORE THAN CAPABLE of having deliberately annoyed him to cause him to be violent, while, at the same time, refusing to stop annoying him or leaving him, while monopolizing his life from all angles… This behavior, is, by the way, abuse. Again, the man in the relationship, when his partner is verbally or even physically attacking him is left with no options; defending himself verbally makes him “verbally abusive”, defending himself physically, by even holding her down as she is trying to attack him, he’s “physically abusive” or at least “physically dominating or controlling”. The woman is rarely seen as the one to blame unless her partner is another woman. If he leaves his wife, he’ll be called out on that, if he stays and lets the situation escalate, it’s again, his fault, and the woman has NO responsibility over the events, not even when she is deliberately and systematically, causing the problems…

Not only is this kind of attitude harmful towards men, it is also completely ignoring the fact that women have been calling for equal treatment in all areas of life, yet they are still demanding priveledges where it suits them, driving fair-minded women who would very much like to handle their own lives for themselves in disadvantage.

Sexually speaking, it is still relatively OK or “humorous” to publically humiliate a man for “having a small one” or “being a lousy lover”. Older women still feel justified in making blatant passes at younger men, without ever thinking twice how disgusting it is to a young person to be rubbed against by an older, unattractive member of the opposite sex, and no amount of leopard print is going to change that.

Speaking of sex, it is an absolute myth to say that men lose their respect for women who are sexually open-minded. Men lose their respect for women who do not know what they want and go along with things just because someone else tells them to, including sex. But men DO NOT lose respect for women who are strong in their own sexuality and mature enough to know what they want out of things – even if they were sexually submissive, which may be confusing but I’ll discuss stuff like that later. Women, however, hold a great interest in observing and controlling other women’s sexual behavior. They do not like women who raise the bar too high, or “do sexual favors” for men, and they will easily slander such women to bring them back to the fold, recruiting those men who want to keep their social stance to join the choir, whether they truly share the sentiment or not.

The only clear advantage that a man has over a woman, that I have noticed in my own life, is that he can choose his own career path without his mother getting an issue of every choice he makes. A man can choose for himself when it is his personal life, easier than a female can. And that concludes the benefits of being a man, and that is a benefit not all men have. (Think the stereotypical Jewish mother -type.)

That is just to point out some of the things that bug me about male-female equality, and I haven’t even gotten started yet.

Subscribe to get a Daily Message