A little more about the Free Spirit Theory

The Free Spirit Theory is a wholistic theory that relies on the idea of immortal souls that reincarnate endlessly into the physical realm collecting experience as it matures. Wherever life came from, it is indestructible. That said, we can do almost anything (in time) else except to die. Our consciousness simply renews physical hosts like data is transferred from a device to another when the older one becomes unusable.

I believe and have concluded that the soul, contrary to popular belief, doesn’t change much, and definitely not randomly, between lifetimes¹, but progresses through time in a logical manner. Essentially, what you are now is the same person you’ve always been, your personality is the same, your interests are the same, your enjoyments are the same, but you were born in a different situation. Your occupation, for instance, is not random. You are likely to choose your line of work based on the same interests and skills that you’ve always had and honed in previous lifetimes… If you have any, that is.

Psychology of the soul

I do no longer see an individual in a one-lifetime scope. I see the psychology of the immortal soul, not the current lifetime expression of it alone. Your parents have not always been your parents (although more than likely they’ve been your parents before, but not every time), and you were not always in the country you now live in. You were very likely the same race you are now because race is very much an individual preference, but there’s no reason why you couldn’t have lived in many different races or species even, or perhaps as a choice of two or three favorite ones. (The choices of race are not always obvious as people LOVE privilege, challenges, and excuses in equal measure.)

The circumstances of your life change you a little, but it is about how will YOU adapt to a new situation. The external of who you are may change, but the internal, your soul, your core, will remain the same but it needs to adapt to a new situation. If you think of yourself as a teacher of some description, as I and many of my True Emotion Mirrors do², you’ll be given life lessons at a higher rate than others, because, well, you need to learn before you can teach. Sometimes your lives are good, sometimes a bit worse, but what I want to make you understand on this website is how to make life choices that will make your NEXT LIFETIME better, EVEN IF you feel you can’t do much for the current one. (It’s also a bit of a trick of the mind, as once you start thinking ahead, you’ll also start thinking short-term without much added effort.)

Your happiness or unhappiness depends on the relationships you form and nurture

Much of what you can, even theoretically, achieve in this world – happiness is one of those things – depends on who you bow down to. Whose idea of who you should be you agree to follow. God? Your parents? Your nominal best friend? Or, perhaps, yourself and your 1st Tier Destination Soulmates, who always have the same goal: Your shared ultimate happiness.

Ironically, would you believe, everyone in this world is conspiring to make everyone in this world happy? I know it doesn’t look like it, but even when we want to hurt others, the ultimate result down the line will be fulfillment and happiness. Interestingly, I have tried to talk myself out of taking revenge on some people, knowing that the outcome of taking such action against them is not that they will be destroyed or hurt, but that they’ll learn a valuable life lesson… That I truly don’t want them to learn, hating them and all. 😉 Revenge would teach them something, and the meaner thing to do is to not teach that lesson to them but let them walk into the same trap again… But it’s too difficult not to.

However, it is equally important to nurture the right relationships and end other relationships, to CLEAR YOUR SPIRITUAL SPACE for ultimate love and happiness… And YOU must be self-confident in your choices as to who ACTUALLY makes you happy, rather than who and what SHOULD make you happy – theoretically speaking. (You know the one who demands you to sacrifice for them? Good or bad? Calling you selfish for not slitting your own throat for them? … So he loved his only son… “oh, woe is me, how I cried when they killed my only begotten son on the cross… Pity ME! How I sacrificed!” Fuck you, God, who was on the cross? Not you. Who was at his feet, torn to shreds? You were looking upon it all thankful for a sacrifice, you POS.)

(You don’t need to feel the wrath toward God as I do to find useful things in here. In fact, he does guide those who are still trusting he’s a loving God, and only shows you he really loves you after you become a true sacrificial lamb as he likes his very favorites to be. So… Your call. Me, however:)

Moral Hedonism or Ethical Selfishness

My philosophy could be described as Moral Hedonism or Ethical Selfishness… Or both. The idea is that each individual should feel entitled to the right to maximize their own happiness without trembling on the rights of other people. My psychological theories try to make this easier to achieve in practicality. This means a lot of it is based on the attempt to explain The Other Perspective. This means achieving the balance of the white and the Normal Person* that fight over dominance inside all of us – according to an old Native American proverb. The Savants* protects others from you, and the Normal Person* protects you from others. Feed and love both wolves equally… Is my take on it, the Native Americans suggested one of the wolves should win…

New old ideas

I have used logical arguing to determine what spiritual ideas are true and what are not. You know how two ideas that contradict each other cannot both be true at the same time. (I’m talking about FACTS, not PREFERENCES that contradict all the time.) Therefore, by the process of checking ideas (proposed facts) against each other, I’ve come up with a psycho-spiritual framework that I call the Free Spirit Theory.

I have tried to disprove my own theories against my best arguments, but there are some inconvenient facts I can’t get around even when I want to. Some of these are inconvenient for you, some for me. Some I love, some I am not crazy about… Here’s a few.

• While gods exist, they’re not really gods, any more than a silverback gorilla is a real god to his troupe. That is to say a silverback has absolute authority in his group. I figure, “a god” is a silverback in now human form that tries to restore the control he once had over his troupe through spirit.
• Monogamy is just one authentic way of existing. Most of us are naturally non-monogamous, without it meaning we don’t make commitments to other people. It’s just that we are capable of making commitments to more than one person simultaneously. (To make it easier to understand, you can commit to a family, people at your work, your friends, just the same as you can commit to several lovers who also love one another.)
• Souls can split and live several lifetimes simultaneously. (I’m slowly growing to appreciate this disturbing thought.)
• Here’s a novel old idea: Sexuality is NORMAL and takes many forms. We are all such individuals in this area, that it is IMPORTANT to understand OTHER’s way of being and refrain from talking about sex in the paradigm of “men and women”, which is ENTIRELY too broad an idea to have any meaningful result of thought.

Intermediate work

This archive is a collection of posts that I’ve written “while still in school” so to speak. Not that I wasn’t well-informed, just that as new points arrive when you mull things over for 10 years straight, the earlier the post, the more raw and incomplete or presumptuous it is. (Although some of it I’ve already edited to match my more recent conclusions.) My later work, albeit more wishy-washy is more accurate, because… Heck. We’re all different and there’s nothing wrong with any given way of being per se. There are just bad combinations of people.

FYI: I am a Savants* 3-Point-Heterosexual Polyandrous Gynandrophile Female

Just rolls of the tongue that one, doesn’t it?

Lesbians and bisexual women, Polygynists, and the Normal Person* do my head in. Some of them, I FUCKING HATE, especially when the litany of terms apply to the same one person. That is not to say they are in any way wrong living their life the way they do or wish they did, it’s just that I don’t mix well with them, AT ALL. My NATURAL alignment is so far removed from that, that some of my texts have come out judgmental and fumey as a result. Bisexuals cannot truly understand why biological gender matters in relationships, and why a heterosexual woman doesn’t LOVE-love other women. (Straight women merely like other women, not truly LOVE them, and that, to a bisexual or lesbian female, seems like a DELIBERATE, targeted insult toward them.)

Interestingly, the men I love, polyandrist bisexual gynandrophile men, are the male variant of the very female I hate, some of them even the Normal Person*. So TRULY I don’t judge them, logically, it’s just that the sexual preference dynamic between myself and bi/lesbian females is WAY OFF and therefore, my personal chemistry with these women doesn’t jive at all… No matter how MUCH they think they’re making progress in charming me, and how much I seem to be welcoming their kindness. There’s simply a wall they will not get past, no matter what, a wall I am not even holding up, it’s just there, because I am who I am. (And many-a-women have tried to break through this frustrating barrier.)

This is also the reason why my focus is naturally drawn toward Polyandrous the Savants* (and the misgivings of their opposites that DO NOT attract). This is also why I often use the Polyandrous the Savants* blah blah as an example of how these dynamics work.

Informal and Trigger Warnings

I like to keep my posts informal. I use the word “fuck” in educational posts where it best describes the act, for instance. Further, I am opinionated, and I try to express myself clearly. Sometimes I want to put my message across regardless of how much it may pain you: that is to say, I do not sign up for ideas such as “All women must be believed”, “you can’t blame the victim” (I very much can blame a victim, particularly those victims who are PLAYING a victim when the situation could have been easily avoided by not trusting that everyone adheres to THEIR idea of how the world should work). There is also no saying what you might find offensive here, as well… Hmph. I am not here to try to SAVE your feelings, I’m here to cultivate you.

I write under a pseudonym while presenting myself as a 3D character for a variety of reasons. The best reason is that I want to avoid the image of an AUTHORITY FIGURE because it saves a certain type from lapping this all up completely without thinking, which is very unhealthy thing to do. This type is the kind that tries to be EVERYTHING AT ONCE to please an authority “look I’m the fastest pupil to accept all you teach me, look I’m gay, straight, AND bi! CHAMP!” So, if I remove my own “credibility” only people who are able to judge a book by its content will be tempted to check me out.

Also. I am a Finn, therefore, I lack social graces and I am forthright and crude by the function of being a fucken Scandinavian. Fuck you. I won’t say “please”. 😀

Welcome

1. I had a run-in with my previous incarnation the other day, who could not BELIEVE that I’d given up on cognitive therapy, a conversation that she believed should fix everything. It’s just that it can take a lifetime for two people who see things very differently to get to the point where they understand each other, and I had changed my mind on whether it was a feasible way to solve problems in realistic terms. Sometimes, sure. Often, even, but… Yeah. Not always. ↩

2. I have, however, decided to retire after this lifetime… In short, fuck this shit. Ironically, I’ve learned to love life, and being a good/impeccable person like I wanted to be is truly not worth it… Just being good enough is enough. ↩

Subscribe to get a Daily Message