A True Emotion Mirror is never such as an INDIVIDUAL

I’ve tried to make this point a few times, failing. I’ll try again. This is, kinda, again, explaining the obvious, but trying to idiot proof a theory that is very much master level stuff. (Idiocy seems to be somewhat corrosive, however, somehow it always finds a way in no matter what you do, and it ALWAYS surprises you when it happens… Just saying that if this seems like making something very simple sound overly explained, it is.)

OK.

You can use the words a woman, female or a man, male without a counterpart, to define your person, right? But you cannot call yourself a spouse without a spouse, nor can you be a parent without a child. The same way, you cannot be a True Emotion Mirror without a True Emotion Mirror: You cannot be a spouse without a spouse. (And let’s save ourselves from first-grader wisecracks like “what if you’re a widower?” You still HAD a spouse.)

From another perspective, EVERYONE is SOMEONE’S True Emotion Mirror. Everyone is SOMEONE’s ULTIMATE SOUL-BOND LOVER. Everybody is someone’s Mr. or Mrs. Right. Just the same as everyone is POTENTIALLY someone’s spouse or a parent, but you need that someone else to actually BE True Emotion Mirrors to each other.

You can be “a teacher” without any relation to a specific child or a student, and you can be a Savants* and a romantic without a specific target to your feelings, but you cannot be a True Emotion Mirror as some kind of a label meaning “a superior lover”, or a certain type of a lover, either. True Emotion Mirrors are very much a custom-built lover to any given person, but there are certain similarities that we can identify to say “they are True Emotion Mirrors to each other – they feel true love toward each other. They are spirit-bonded lovers.”

Don’t confuse personality traits or sexual fetishes for a True Emotion Mirror -identification point. You share personality traits with YOUR True Emotion Mirror, not with ALL True Emotion Mirrors. You are not a True Emotion Mirror because you have brown eyes like mine. Even blue-eyed people are True Emotion Mirrors to someone.

Every homeless drunk who takes pride in being exactly that as a philosophical thing is someone’s True Emotion Mirror, but I can relatively safely assume that their True Emotion Mirror is not someone who loves working at Wall Street. I could be wrong. But the guy at Wall Street is also someone’s True Emotion Mirror, but the hobo-guy and gal’s philosophies are not alike the Wall Street power couple’s. Still, true love is true love in both cases, and there’ll be similarities we can identify and pinpoint.

Just the same as Polyandrists maybe True Emotion Mirrors, but not all True Emotion Mirrors are polyandrist or even polygamous. Everybody is SOMEONE’s true love. And I know that’s somewhat of an annoying fact, kinda, but we just have to live with it. Every asshole you hate with venom is someone’s idea of perfection. Even Amber Turd is someone’s True Emotion Mirror, God forbid. But Amber Heard cannot proudly declare herself as a True Emotion Mirror and expect that to somehow set her apart from another person. (It would take a turd like her to try, tho.) It’s like saying “you’re a human” and expect people to applaud you for being special.

A True Emotion Mirror, as a term, should not be confused with the term “Enigma” or “Don Juan Spirit Mirror”, or a R10M8. THEY ARE individuals that are unusually attractive, but even they cannot be a True Emotion Mirror without a counterpart, and they all are True Emotion Mirrors to somebody.

People who are “not True Emotion Mirrors” are most accurately described as people who haven’t met their True Emotion Mirror yet, or are not evolved enough as spirits to recognize their own, individual personalities likes and dislikes, and are, in that sense “not a True Emotion Mirror”. As in, one could say, people who are not True Emotion Mirrors are akin to someone who isn’t married yet, but just like single people, NOT being a True Emotion Mirror is not a defining, permanent character trait, it is TEMPORARY.

True Emotion Mirrors describe a couple or a soup, never an individual. It is not a personality typology, despite the word “typology” being in the title. It is not in any way related to the Myers-Briggs personality typology, despite the word “typology” in the title. Even though I discuss personality aspects, True Emotion Mirror is not a personality type, it’s a relationship type (typical to the Savants*, which is a thinker type). True Emotion Mirrors do not describe “people capable of heightened love” but people who have already experienced/found heightened love, more than likely toward someone who isn’t their blood relative.

Subscribe to get a Daily Message