How the Survivalist* and the Idealists* resemble each other

the Idealists* have a strong sense of who they are as an individual. If their idea of who they are, who they love to be, falls into the ideal of some other group, such as “men” or “women”, they may seem like highly submissive the Survivalist*. As in, a Idealists* man who wants nothing more than to raise a family may seem like a stereotypical the Survivalist*, same as a Idealists* man who has honed his seduction skills to align with the Survivalist* woman instead of a Idealists* woman. Then again, a Idealists* woman may be highly sexual DESPITE the wishes of the society at large, but very much in alignment with sex-loving men. A Survivalist* woman, in all times before now, should act relatively prudishly, apart from the Survivalist* women who see their worth to have diminished to the status of a prostitute. That is not to say all prostitutes are the Survivalist* women, not at all, but the women who suffer being prostitutes are the Survivalist* women. The Idealists* woman would never do it if she felt she was suffering for it.

As the Survivalist* feel joy for pleasing others, no matter what they must do in order to please others – whether they IMAGINE they are pleasing others or actually doing so, they may interpret a Idealists*’s pleasure of doing what they want as pleasure of pleasing others. The Idealists*, however, want to do both of those things at the same time: do as they want with someone who enjoys their actions the same way as they enjoy doing them. The Survivalist*, when they feel liberated and powerful, feel so when they please nobody. When they are absolutely abhorrent in their behavior and have every freedom of being so without anyone stopping them… Like a dictator-level leader. An the Idealists* in that position would always seek to be kind to others and make sure everybody is served well under their protection. An the Idealists* dictator sees themselves as the protector of their land and their people, not the only person with the right to destroy it and them.

the Idealists* who thrive to give pleasure to their chosen people while receiving pleasure themselves can confuse the Survivalist* to no end. The Survivalist* do not understand mutual satisfaction, they can only see the satisfaction in the dominant/submissive counterpart, where the submissive is FORCED to submit, not given the freedom to do so. BDSM games don’t make any sense to the Survivalist*, because all of it is a play of pretending, where the submissive is always in charge, but many the Survivalist* are drawn to BDSM even though they don’t have the foggiest idea how it works. They will always overstep their mark, brat more than submit, and so forth. Only the Idealists* know how to do BDSM or polyamory, but the Survivalist* are drawn to BDSM for the freedom to brutalize others, and to polyamory, because it gives them a community to be a part of… Even if it means they’ll have to prostitute themselves to others in order to be a part of the polyamorous community.

the Survivalist* will always try to blend into any group they want to be a part of, and they think the Idealists* are doing the same thing. However, the Idealists* seek for a group that already match their values, while the Survivalist* will change their external values to be a part of a group. The Idealists* adjust their sharpest edges in order to keep peace in groups they have no other option than to adjust to, like school, churches, or a job, a family or another group – particularly when young, but the Idealists*’ sharpest edges come out the older they get, the more money they have, and the more choice they get. The Idealists* become less accommodating with age, and the Survivalist* become better adjusted to everything, albeit more than likely disillusioned with the lack of love they receive despite their best efforts to submit to other’s will.

An the Idealists* in the right group seems well-adjusted like the Survivalist*, but the Survivalist* in the wrong group seems groveling and desperate for acceptance. An the Idealists* who is truly in love with someone will behave similarly to the Survivalist* who is simply hoping that they will get love out of this person, but that doesn’t make them the same. The Survivalist* are quick to think they are loved by someone especially if that someone shows aggression toward them, which can happen between True Emotion Mirror pair of the Idealists*. The Survivalist* are a bit quick to draw on the “I’m loved unconditionally” -belief, whereas the Idealists* take a lot longer to accept they… MIGHT BE.

Still, often, the difference is a hair, and the Survivalist* are less likely than the Idealists* to be able to even consider themselves in an objective light enough to see the difference. Despite my best efforts to have the Survivalist* self-assess themselves in a psychological test like the Idealists* do without problems, the Survivalist* tend to choose the wrong category, but then again, the Idealists*, can, too, but, again from a different perspective. The Survivalist* choose it “because I can’t be in the WRONG category!” the Idealists* choose the wrong category “because I can’t give myself a compliment of being a Idealists*, because THAT small thing puts me into the Survivalist* category”.

Speaking of dictators, I’m prone to put Adolf Hitler into the Idealists* category, but most of his followers into the Survivalist* category. I believe Hitler’s situation was very… Troubled, but I authentically believe that his intentions were to improve humanity, not DICTATE it. I believe he did what he did in the genuine belief that some ugly things needed to happen for a better tomorrow, and he was wrong, of course, so incredibly wrong, but I do believe his idealism came from the Idealists* category even though his actions were that of the Survivalist*. I also believe that a lot of what was happening in Nazi Germany was hidden from him by the Survivalist* followers who feared him and that he was operating largely blind to the events at times. I am in no way trying to sanctify what he was doing, just saying that he is a great example of a Idealists* that seems to be the Survivalist* by his personality traits, when, in fact, he wasn’t.

Subscribe to get a Daily Message