the Savants* thinking and the Normal Person* thinking – me rethinking

I’ve been dancing around this one for a long time. There is a state where people go by the society’s norms even though they are the Savants*, obviously, and they want to please and tolerate people UP TO A POINT. That is a Savants* thinking way of being. They DO follow the expectation when they somewhat agree with it and when it doesn’t cause them a lot of pain or inconvienience to do it. They will follow their own guidance where it matters to them, and they pick their battles a lot.

The Normal Person* are always seeking for someone to TELL THEM WHAT TO DO and what to be, how to think, how to act, and how to attract a mate, right?

Slightly more evolved the Normal Person* are asking for acknowledgement: “Isn’t this good enough yet? Aren’t I doing well enough yet?”

the Normal Person* in the flux start to become aware that there is no such thing as “pleasing everybody” or “one correct way to live” and they find this extremely distressing and annoying. They start begging for real answers, demanding them, and being hungry for freaking answers.

The next step is to realize there IS no answers, there is simply living your life the way YOU want it, because the only person you can’t live without is yourself, everyone else is detached from you, separate from you – and the Normal Person* fight this realization to the extreme!

OK. Being social and being anti-social… Using an aggressive bonding style and using the respectful bonding styles may be learned, so are these at all an indicator of the Normal Person*/the Savants* thinking considering that men have learned to treat women “mean to keep them keen”, or should they be only discussed as the Normal Person*/the Savants* thinking signs separately in order to avoid confusion?

How much of the Normal Person*/the Savants* thinking is a reaction to insecurities while faced with one’s True Emotion Mirror, and how much does this have to do with the polygynous female and polyandrous male insecurity caused by potential rejection by the True Emotion Mirror trying to live a monogamous life style in previous lifetimes, causing the majority gender member to be rejected as the single gender partner can only have one man/woman at a time in a monogamous society, teaching the ‘left overs’ that they are not good enough, when in reality the main question often is simply the order of arrival (either in reincarnation order or per lifetime).

Subscribe to get a Daily Message