the Cat Thinking is a trauma of trying to get to Heaven on clean papers.

There are two ways to do Christianity: One is to try and commit no sins hoping to get to Heaven with clean papers. The other, is to trust your sins are forgiven and plod along like you always did. Both are pretty bad ways of doing it. There really isn’t a good way to be a Christian if you ask me; I used to be a very serious one. Either you let others hurt you in the hopes that it’ll give you a spot in Heaven, or you allow yourself to hurt others because you’ll be forgiven.

To be fair, the Normal Person* Thinking is a trauma of the Cat Thinking, and vice versa. The healthy way of being is somewhere in the middle. What is the sickness is trying to be friends with people we don’t truly love, and trying to be people we think would be loved. We change ourselves to earn love – not truly God’s, I don’t think, but other people’s. Even if we’re not religious, we still do it. (I am not so intimately familiar with other religions to say if all this applies, but one or another way, they must.)

Forced into hiding.

Civilized societies force you to hide a lot of who you are. This creates fake friendships and fake marriages, even.

Now, the Normal Person* seem to be quite naive about this part of life; they tend to believe what you see is what you get, and that friends don’t hide themselves from friends. The key secret is often sexual. The Savants* are basically closet perverts, just pick which type. The Normal Person* have at least a lid on it; they don’t act on it nearly as often, and they think everyone does. When they do, they usually do it in disgusting ways.

the Savants* forgive themselves their sexuality. The Normal Person* forgive themselves their selfishness. The Savants* hide their sexual pursuits, but find a way to indulge (with guilt), the Normal Person* do what they do and trust they will be forgiven.

the Savants* kinda hate all things merciful.

the Savants* TRY to learn to be merciful, to forgive, to accept, to understand, to find meaning in things they absolutely hate. They are critical, judgmental, and unforgiving in their judgment – but they don’t like PUNISHING people. The Normal Person* punish. The reason is this: People, both types, should only punish those they love. The Normal Person* love a lot of the Savants* who would be horrified to know they think they’re real friends or family. They would never allow themselves to be judged and punished by THOSE PEOPLE, who are NOWHERE NEAR sin-free themselves.

the Savants* feel strongly that “may he who is without sin cast the first stone,” and they do cast a lot of stones over things they are sin-free over. They JUDGE others when they are not afraid of being judged by them. However, the Normal Person* punish you for not reaching your full potential, not over shit that they can or cannot do. This is actual love, but it’s often shown to people who don’t love them back, and thus, doesn’t feel good or in the right place.

Nobody wants to be judged or punished by a person they don’t truly love. Oddly enough, when you are judged by a person you love and adore, and punished as a consequence, it feels good. Therefore, the Normal Person* THINK the Savants* they love LOVE the punishment, because they love the Savants*.

the Savants* are smarter, is the problem.

We hide our sexual perversions, but what divides us is our IQ.

the Savants* are smarter than average. They find it difficult to make real friends in childhood and teen years. They get stuck trying to “swim out” of their original pond, and while they TRY to find people equally smart. They may find something, but lacking some key social skills – PURSUING a relationship – usually fail to make friends among those smart enough for them to love. The further down the bell curve end they are, the harder it will be for them to find someone they’d love, and the more dumber-than-them people along the way will hang onto them in desperate hope to be loved by them.

The x-factor, in a person, is, in case you didn’t know; high IQ. No matter if they’re a rock star or a a scientist, their IQ is what draws people to them. However, this is the thing; people are drawn to them, and they don’t know what it takes to sufficiently pursue another person of a high IQ. This is why high IQ people NEED communities made only for them. (And the IQ tests that are currently used don’t measure enough varieties of IQ, hence my personality tests (Personality Quest), that measure the symptoms of a high IQ rather than IQ itself.)

the Savants* also must learn to brush people off without feeling guilty about it. Psychology must stop pushing people into bullshit relationships and understand IQ is the KEY FACTOR in whether a relationship should exist at all. The Savants* that suffer being IN unfulfilling relationships with people dumber than them much more than what they suffer being alone. An Savant* should never accept advice from a person with a lower than 140 IQ… That is Mensa-cut-off point. At that score, THIS particular problem starts to be an apparent one. At any rate, people shouldn’t form relationships further than with people approximately 10 IQ points from where they are. According to a study, efficient communication becomes impossible with a 30 IQ point difference. (I will have to get some real help to say what numbers are the real ones, but by my gut-feeling that’s where I’d poke a stick at.)

the Cat Thinking value system is largely based on surviving relationships with dumb people.

Whether you’re a Savants* or the Normal Person*, the fact is you will never fall in love with a person significantly dumber than you. You may LOVE a person with a low IQ, kinda, but you cannot FALL in love, romantically, with someone with a significantly lower IQ than yours. To a lot of the Savants* normal relationships are directly comparable to an average person being always surrounded and expected to form romantic relationships with people with an intellectual disability.

Imagine average people being guilted because they don’t particularly like romancing and having sexual relationships with people with intellectual disabilities. Now. Notice this: An average IQ is 90-100. A Mensa-cut off point is 140. People like Einstain, Bill Gates, Elon Musk and my ex, are around 160 IQ point mark. And then… When people’s IQ raises above that, they tend to turn a little lazy… And think themselves to be stupid, because nothing in this world seems sensible to them. A person with an IQ of a 175 is unlikely to bother with the world’s bullshit, knowing it’s all fallacy.

The cut of point to an intellectual disability is 70. This means that 20-30 IQ point difference. The difference between a Mensa member – which is not that high of a score yet – is already 40 to 50  points from the average person. This is why the Savants* suffer. They’re practically marrying idots, and being guilted because they can’t truly feel “lucky” to have them. To a lot of smart men, they’re wife is an intellectual equivalent of an adoring pet dog with an ability to talk. I’m being cruel. A smart person married to an average person is equivalent to an average person being married to a 7-14-year-old, and expected to treat them as their direct equal. (A dog would be about a 2-year-old, so… 😉 ) Is it even ethical, one wonders.

Subscribe to get a Daily Message