the Survivalist* Packs

the Survivalist* Pack is a bond of several the Survivalist* who have made a lasting connection to each other over several shared lifetimes. These are highly bonded soulmates, but unlike True Emotion Mirrors, they click through their failures, weaknesses, abusiveness, immorality, or alternatively their addictions, sicknesses, and disabilities. It isn’t always as bad as it sounds, but it is not entirely ideal. They either bond through being a loser or through being evil, or potentially both at the same time.

A Survivalist* shows love by accepting your failures. They let you off the hook. They allow you to “be shit,” as I’d say, exactly as I feel they mean. To the Survivalist*, conditional love is a curse word. In contrast, to a Idealists*, it is the goal, ambition, the height of compliments. To the Survivalist*, all demands of virtue are the antinome of what true love is about. A Survivalist* Pack is, thus, a collection of people who have given each other the green light to be horrible in the name of love.

Fear of demands.

the Survivalist* are convinced they do not have what it takes to reach other people’s standards. They believe they are destined to be failures, and their only option of survival is to cheat in some ways. A Pack of the Survivalist* is effectively a collective that allows each other to fail upon failing, as long as they don’t betray each other. Frankly, the Idealists* in their community need to watch the Survivalist* Pack from the outside, so they don’t turn into criminal organizations. Having said that, you’ll more than likely see them for what they are right from the onset – they are usually not interested in maintaining their health and figure any more than they are willing to mind their moral compass.

Exterior of virtue.

the Survivalist* can also put up a beautiful front to hide their rotten core. Once you scratch the surface, tho, you’ll find lies, cheating, broken contracts, false donations, bribery, bad debt, you name it, all in the attempt to pull a fast one wherever they can. They feel true love is about showing your true colors to your lovers while upholding a respectable exterior to the outside. The Survivalist* also wholly believe that the Idealists* don’t exist and that all the Idealists* are simply BETTER AT LYING than most the Survivalist* are.

In the words of the Idealists* George Bernard Shaw: “The liar’s punishment is, not in the least that he is not believed, but that he cannot believe anyone else.”

The Silverlining.

There is a silver lining tho. Once they get the full permission to drop the ball completely, they will eventually improve their performance once the Survivalist* trusts they are loved at their very worst. Once loved at their worst, they’ll give their loved ones the best, but only after they’ve visited the zest pool, Hyi Vittu, and found themselves be loved regardless.

Many the Idealists* choose to take in and bond with a disgraced the Survivalist* out of pity, not out of love. The Idealists* believe everyone deserves a second chance. In believing that, the Idealists* tend to make accidental friends with the Survivalist*, who think they are unconditionally loved BECAUSE they’ve been rubbish enough. The Idealists* are often troubled youth councilors and social workers, who, to the Survivalist*, are like unconditional love automats, looking for a new posse.

The Survivalist* will be bonded to a Idealists* instead of the Survivalist* and is now bound to the expectation of improved performance and morals rather than being given unconditional love no matter what the Survivalist* hoped. This is why you must avoid charitable bindings with people you don’t AUTHENTICALLY love from the onset, without much of a logical reason. The Idealists* should only take in people they truly love without boundaries or expectations senselessly. The Idealists* do forgive their counterparts anything, too, albeit they fall in love through strengths and virtue, rather than failure and lack of moral compass.

Ambition in being crap.

You could say that the Survivalist* are ambitious in being shit, as I’ll take the liberty to express it. They want you to know they’ll break any rule or law to be what you expect them to be: ruthless in your protection, fearless in the face of “the enemy” as they see everybody who isn’t in their pack. They court you by showing you their very worst, unlike a Idealists* that wants you to see them in the best light possible; what they are CAPABLE of being for you, so they don’t have to resort to activities that would shame you as their partner.

They also assume that once you’ve committed, they’ll see you at your worst, and you share your secrets (the shortcuts you took to get where you are at) with them and to coax you to trust them with those secrets they will show you theirs.

Example.

Probably the most famous attempt to the Survivalist* bonding ever in history is Amber Heard’s pathetic attempt to woo the pants of Johnny Depp by being an ambitiously rubbish person. Her willingness to gloriously drop the ball in every venue of life must be considered awestriking. 10 points for boldness, 0 for strategy.

She flew into a fury because the Idealists* Johnny didn’t show her his secrets; his bad side and how he got to his enviable position in Hollywood, and how he’d stayed there for all the decades he did. She felt betrayed as her mafia boss image of Johnny Depp didn’t turn out to be true, but what she saw was a law-abiding, kind man, which, to the Survivalist*, is nothing but “a wuss.”

Alternatively, she saw a man who considered himself “above her” because he kept “asking for her” to show a worse and worse side to herself: “you are not bad enough yet, Amber, for me to divulge my secrets to you. Show me you’ve got what it takes.” When she kept failing his horrible expectations, he finally divorced her, and then Amber tried to make a further point about how bad she could be to win him back. Unfortunately, she was wooing a Idealists*, who feels nothing but revolt at exhibits as Ambers’ idea of “love.”

I woke up startled from a dream once during Amber Heard’s and Johnny Depp’s initial deposition times. In it, Johnny Depp was being questioned by Amber Heard’s lawyer. She asked him: “Would you be proud of Amber if she wins this case?” Johnny’s startlement woke me up. There was no way to answer a question like that. He was falsely accused of being violently abusive against Amber, and her lawyer asked if he’d be proud of Amber if she’d prove her lies to be true. THIS is how the Survivalist* think: “Would you be proud of me if I managed to screw you over properly? Would you love me then?”

YouTube has tons of videos on this infamous unmedicated disaster, in case you’re curious.

Subscribe to get a Daily Message