the Normal Person* turn to codependent narcissists, and the Savants* turn into psychopaths

Now, before I start, I must inform you that I am not a psychologist or a psychiatrist, or anything to the effect. I am a layman with a knack for psychology. The following is for professionals to consider and prove, and for anyone who feels confident to make up their own mind about what they think… But if you’re uncertain of yourself, perhaps best to stop reading right now.

OK, my term the Normal Person* means a person who always feels like there needs to be a dominant and submissive in a relationship, (but not in the sexual part of the relationship). They don’t care which it is, as long as it’s there. A Normal Person*-behavior can also be learned, even when it’s not entirely authentic. This will then make it so, that if a true the Savants* is put under enough pressure (more on that later) the effect is the same as on a  person who is openly the Savants*.

An the Savants* is a person who always seek to equalize a relationship dynamic (and saves sub/dom -games into the bedroom). An the Savants* PLAYS with power dynamics, but never takes them seriously to the point where the Normal Person* does. A Normal Person* ALWAYS believes to be an equal to everyone around them, so they “play” with power dynamics, believing that NOBODY TRULY minds them, because they cannot see where play ends and reality begins.

Now.

When a person is being subjected to “no you can’t leave me/us, for we love you” game, which among the Savants* would be somewhat mild or non-existing even between (a term for soulbond lovers who truly belong together), they can turn toward psychopathy to get out of that game: “You need to let me go. If you cannot let me be in charge of my own life, I’ll have to take it back. In order to do that, I need to kill all emotions, pity, and compassion toward you and people you value.” This MAY lead into a killing-spree, that has a spiritual meaning of: “SEE?! You DO Not Want ME Around You! Let Me GO!” (Charles Manson was not a psychopath, I don’t care what anyone says about it, so don’t use him as an example in your mind. I don’t think he was in any way involved with the first murder, the second perhaps, not knowing what the hell to do to stop it, but it’s completely possible the kids made up the whole thing about him having been there, to give him credit for something they thought was “cool” or “heroic”, and what they thought he wanted to do but was too scared to do himself. The Normal Person*, by the way, the kids. Turns psychopathic to impress someone they want to be loved by.)

A group is stupidity condensed, says a Finnish proverb. It’s about the Normal Person*. In a group of the Savants* , intelligence is condensed, but the Normal Person* go by the lowest common denominator (inclusive thinking), not by the highest goal (exclusive thinking).

The main difference between the Normal Person* and the Savants* behavior is that the Normal Person* is an experimentor: They don’t believe the final answer can be “there’s no love for you here”, so they keep trying new things to find the key to someone’s heart or forgiveness. An the Savants* is a lot more experienced spirit. They know already. They know a lot more things at childhood than what an adult the Normal Person* knows instinctively.

USUALLY, the way this works is that a Savants* takes pity on the Normal Person* and starts playing along with them, regardless their own feelings. But if a Savants* is TRULY fed up with the Normal Person*, they can walk away from them permanently. If, for some reason, this is not possible (the Normal Person* has, for instance, ruined them financially so that they can’t leave, or have had them committed to assume total control, or similar) the Savants* may turn psychopathic in order to regain the control of their own life.

Subscribe to get a Daily Message