When everything you say sounds like flirtation to another person

the Normal Person* are people who are impossible to discourage in love (friendship and family relationships)… They are either driven by insecurity or entitlement, but whichever it is, it means if they want/need you, they’ll go after you and do not take no for an answer. A Normal Person* either believes love is always available to those who want it, or true love doesn’t exist at all, so there’s no point rejecting me because you’re hoping for something better. If they have been taught that this or that doesn’t matter in a relationship, they truly believe it and argue against you if you try to point out what matters to you matters to you. They are always trying to adjust to alternate expectations to match theirs and attempt to speak according to the values of the community they were born into unless they move into a bigger city.

Because the Normal Person* and the Savants* live from the opposite “obvious,” they emphasize different things in their philosophies. As the Normal Person* are rarely philosophical in any other way but to emphasize the value of family and the importance of love as a material to uphold the family, most, if not all, other philosophies are the Savants* doing. The Savants* struggle with different things, however. Still, their natural alignment makes it so that they are always concerned about another person’s feelings and well-being. Since the Normal Person*’s well-being is always linked to everyone banding together permanently, many the Savants* philosophies try to take the Normal Person* into account where it’s unnatural for a Savants* to do.

General inclusion -philosophy turning into an unbreakable love relationship.

When the Savants* are trying to find a peaceful way for all to live, they TRY to ensure the freedom of each INDIVIDUAL. However, the Normal Person* doesn’t think that way. They always try to find a way to obligate (free) each individual into the service of the greater unit. From a Savants* perspective, to understand what they’re attempting to do, they show love by enslaving others into the service of the Alpha – whoever or whatever that may be.

When a Savants* words this into philosophy, they want to create a SOCIETY that includes everyone. This also goes with a Savants* mentality. HOWEVER, with a Savants*, they never feel the need to separately emphasize the freedom and rights of each individual in terms of their PERSONAL life choices. They are only ever mandating the cooperative principles, in the sense of charity and societal rights of an individual. A Normal Person*, however, will expand these principles to the private lives of other individuals: “You have no right to say I am not qualified to be your spouse; you don’t have one, and I am available.” The problems multiply when someone says, “I am a polyamorist…”

Don’t let standards get in the way of unity.

This is going to get tricky to understand. The Normal Person* mindset is always on inclusion, finding ONE Alpha for all, then forming families within that One Alpha umbrella ruling. This is Stepford Wife -stuff, every white-overalls-for-all Sci-fi horror movie ever created -material. Where couples are formed for the greater good based on whatever doctrine and how things are now, there IS no doctrine. The doctrine is: Beauty doesn’t matter, IQ doesn’t matter, wealth doesn’t matter, age doesn’t matter, gender doesn’t matter… The difficulty for the Normal Person* is that they don’t know how to love unless the rules of love aren’t given to them externally.

the Normal Person* try to establish the natural leader and the hierarchy under the Alpha by instinct. Therefore, they argue a lot. They test your resolve as to how certain you are that you are on the hierarchical ladder where you think you are. They see a high-level individual, but they don’t know where, in regards to that person, they themselves are, lest they test it out by arguing, trying to seduce that person, trying to make them submit into a domestic partnership with them. The Normal Person* hasn’t got the foggiest idea of what “true love” means from a Savants* standpoint. Not the foggiest. No matter how much you explain that to them. To the Normal Person*, true love means inclusion… By whoever includes them… And whatever, violence included, that person does to them once they’ve included them.

This setting creates people who do not understand the concept of “standards,” or love based on achievement or even treating another person well. I call them ‘zestpoolians’ because these are people who value no other virtue, only love. They TRULY TRULY TRULY mean it: no matter how horrible of a person you are, you still deserve love, and no matter how despicably you treat another person, you still deserve love. If that is true for them, try to explain to them why such things as looks or intelligence would matter, and you get a guilt trip on “such things don’t matter in a relationship” because to them, only body heat matters.

In their mind, the only reason why you would possibly reject them is your psychopathy, and they’re willing to play doctor.

Discouraging such a person from love, persuading them that their love is not returned, is… Well, impossible. They will give any explanation, no matter how far-fetched, to explain the fact you don’t love them. They will assume YOU are a psychopath (or a narcissist) because you don’t love them. (But you’re alone, and if you cannot bond with another person, you’re a psychopath. (Did you see Lobster, the movie?)) Further, they will believe your feelings for another person must be based on something “wrong” or “shallow” because, well… Why else would you choose that person over them, considering they know only their love is real.

Ignore them or be bonded forever

To them, there is no reason why another person wouldn’t love another; if love is offered one way, it must be returned the other way… In their world, no interaction needs to happen between people who wouldn’t be willing to die for one another. Ignoring them, thus, from day one is important. They would never treat anyone kindly, lest it was to offer personal friendship, love, or romance to that person – not even if that person was their own child. They think like an animal mother, who would leave the runt of the litter without nurture or care. If you decide to care for the runt (or it’s mandated by law that you must), you are bound to that person forever.

So when someone treats them kindly or attentively, they take it as a promise of love eternal.

the Normal Person* feels a superior MUST BE cold and unkind to the lower on the hierarchy.

These are the crazy psychos that scream to Katy Perry that she’s a whoring slut because she was once kind to them but didn’t realize she was supposed to follow that up with a wedding. These are the same people who fully believe celebrities SHOULD BE mean and nasty toward everyone around them because how else can they stop themselves from getting married constantly? Thus, when celebrities are kind to them during a fan meetup, they feel sorry for the star who must be super lonely as they are “begging for love” being kind to everyone there…

And if you think these people are rare… Think again. The ones who don’t turn into stalkers didn’t fall in love with you… In their mind, they REJECTED you. By my gut feeling, the Normal Person* are ABOUT 50 percent of all population, so this is far from a minor group of people… Just that they don’t become a problem to each other, they speak the same language, and secondly, they only “accept” the “love offered” from a fraction of the other 50%.

They also know how relationships work so much better than you do

So be very careful to notice that these are not women nor men, but there’s about an even number of both in both genders, all races, and all sexual orientations. Still, the Normal Person* men have been forced to tone it down by the Savants* men, as this behavior coming from a man is so threatening, they’ll wind up in jail with a high probability where women don’t. The Normal Person* also make the majority of sex offenders’ lists. Still, this could be your mother we’re talking about.

You know them by their insistence that marriages are 100% commitment, that divorces are a sign of a narcissistic society (rather than about the realization that people, particularly when young, make mistakes). They are happy to guilt you for leaving everyone and anyone – except when you get on a high horse and claim the person you dumped “deserved it,” or “was no good to you,” or when you find a better financial provider than you had previously.

They are more than willing to teach you how relationships work, and it means you will be the servant, and they’ll be the beneficiary, and they have no idea why anyone would consider that weird. (Oh right, they’ll reward you, for sure, in their creepy way, that is.)

If you are a Savants* and suspect you got caught with the Normal Person*… Act quickly

The only situation where you should get involved with a person like this is when you are already 100% committed to them and you feel no fear. They’re not bad people, by any means; it’s just that when they get attached – and they attach super easily like superglue, too – they’re near impossible to remove and can take YEARS out of your life trying to get away from one of these people – especially if they hear of something like the Twin Flame -concept, that gives them all the justification in the world to keep stalking another person!

Anyway, if you notice someone getting attached to you when you don’t want it, act super bubbly and excited about “dating,” and start talking to them about all the dates you’re going to go on before you make a real decision about who you’re going to get serious with. Don’t seem overly demanding; they’ll think, “oh, they’ve got such a high standards nobody will reach them, and they’ll find that out soon.” List demands that you feel ANYONE should be able to reach, and if you’d KNOW/found out this person doesn’t, it would be quite embarrassing for them.

Like, “I don’t want anyone who has got a C grade at an exam… Like In Their Life!” (A is asking too much, F is asking too little, so it must sound reasonable in some sense, but something anyone could have got once or twice.) If they slip out: “Oh well, ANYONE could have gotten a C?” Laugh and go: “Oh, you’re not saying you have?! OMG! That rules you out, then!” But always sound super casual about it, like it’s just FUN to be looking for your ideal partner and that your standards aren’t really real; they’re just a game you play. (Think of a few similar “standards” to present them with.)

If you ever get someone offered to you as a date because they meet all your standards, cheerfully declare you’ve got new standards.

Never try directly rejecting them or softening the blow with these.

Always try to clarify how you are still on the market by giving the impression that you’re still excitedly looking for other options. PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS MAY BACKFIRE BADLY if a person you want is the Normal Person*, as in one of these people, or used to think this way by experience. If you seem to be playing the field, they don’t realize you want them – even if you are trying to give them the space they need to decide whether they like you or not.

These people look too busy for a commitment. Never directly engage them in a conversation if you want them to think you don’t want them. No matter how nasty it gets, all they think, they’ve got your attention, which means you’re interested, and that’s all there is to it.

Steadfast rule to follow should be universal, global, and undeniable: the Normal Person* and the Savants* must not make friends or marry without consideration. However, a Savants* can choose to bond with the Normal Person* for life.

This is the ONLY SAFE WAY to go about our relationships, as bad as this sounds: By default, the Normal Person* and the Savants* should never make friends or lovers. However, if a Savants* wants to take on the Normal Person*, they will completely let go of the right to divorce or to end the relationship until death does them part. The Normal Person* relationships MUST BE MINIMUM LIFE LONG, 100% of the time, and should a Savants* knowingly marry or befriend the Normal Person*, they must honor this bond for an entire life, or “forever” if they’ve so vowed.

However, the Normal Person* that poses as a Savants* to fool them into a  marriage or a bond of friendship, without making it clear they expect a lifelong commitment, in either case, can and will be divorced or unfriended as per the request of the Savants*. A Normal Person* that poses as a Savants* should be named and shamed by their community of the Normal Person* and avoided, at all cost, by the Savants*. The punishment for posing as a Savants* should be severe.

Subscribe to get a Daily Message