Where the Survivalist* and the Idealists* are the same

There are some ways that the Survivalist* and the Idealists* are very similar. One of them is this: Both types want everyone to be happy – the big difference is what brings them happiness. When both types try to explain to the other that they’re free to do these things that make everyone happy, the other type feels pressured to do something they are not interested in. The Idealists* are a little bit more aware of this difference in thinking and therefore try to leave the Survivalist* to their family matters, but the Survivalist* can’t quite see this. But we can all rest assured that all people want everybody to be happy… And that do unto others as you’d do to yourself, thus, is bad advice… What you should do, to make others happy, is what they do to you… The difficulty being that the Survivalist* will try to break you to make you into a friend when a Idealists* tries to break only their enemies to make them flee and leave them alone.

Both the Survivalist* and the Idealists* act out of love by default

Both the Survivalist* and the Idealists* act out of love by default, yet, they express love very differently. The Survivalist* test others by what the Idealists* interpret as hate, and the Idealists* express kindness and willingness to make friends in a way that the Survivalist* interpret as contempt and expression of superiority.

There’s a difference that makes the interaction between the Survivalist* and the Idealists* difficult. The Survivalist* won’t truly ever hate anybody, it seems, and they don’t really understand the feeling of hate at all. Although it takes a lot for a Idealists* to truly feel hate, they are capable of it. The Survivalist* will hate easier – but not really. They take extreme hate as some form of love or disappointment, never as actual, stone-cold hate. That’s why they tend to be completely fearless in facing brutality, as they feel a direct attack on them is a sign of insecurity or unrequited love, not… hate.

the Idealists* feel universal, impersonal love toward all humanity and all creation, but they are, in return, capable of absolute, true hate, too. This is missing in the Survivalist*, who will feel hate only as a reaction to personal rejection. They will ever “hate” people who have rejected their love, but they will never TRULY hate anyone. That puts them in danger with the Idealists* who have been pushed to absolute hate, and they’ll walk like lambs to slaughter if a Idealists* has turned psychopathic due to unfortunate circumstances of being surrounded by the Survivalist* that he or she cannot feel complete love for.

the Survivalist* and the Idealists* both want to find everlasting love

Both types want to find everlasting love and everlasting soul bonds, but they seek it from different places. The Survivalist* want to find reliable people, the Idealists* want to find exciting, stimulating people. As the Idealists* often feel a responsibility toward the entire humanity (or Earth and all living things on it, the Survivalist* very much included into that bunch), the Survivalist* will consider the Idealists* reliable on a PERSONAL level, which they are not.

the Idealists* are quick to offer help, kind words, support, and first aid to those in need, which the Survivalist* never do, and this, to the Survivalist*, is a signal this person can be relied upon. They’re willing to serve them – on a personal level. They also feel that the more talented a person is, the more they’re there to serve the god-like the Survivalist*, who may be less in capabilities, but as a function of being the Survivalist* in the Idealists* world, take it as a sign of higher importance than what a Idealists* is: after all, if someone more capable serves your needs, that means you’re important – like a King or a God, who yields the power by their birth right. (You know how kings and queens can be somewhat lacking in all ways, frail in body and mind, prone to madness, and whatever, but they’ll still be served as a ruler.) This is why the Survivalist* relies on the Idealists* for everlasting love, but will never find it in a Idealists*.

the Idealists* get stuck with the Survivalist*, who are ALWAYS NEEDY, they are ALWAYS seeking first-aid-level love that the Idealists* feels compelled to grant them. The Idealists*, in order to find everlasting love, will have to learn to avoid the Survivalist*-trap, to deny them first aid, and everything they are not willing to give them for the rest of their lives OR offer them small morsels of love in return for something the Idealists* can actually use: “Like my posts and I will send you love in return..” Strategies exist.

Both the Survivalist* and the Idealists* want to be a part of something bigger than themselves

Even though both the Survivalist* and the Idealists* want to be a part of something bigger than themselves, again, they interpret this need very differently. The Idealists* want to serve an idea, a cause, some ideal that will make the world a better place, whereas the Survivalist* want to be a part of a bigger group than themselves. The Survivalist* want the social aspect of an idealistic movement, where the Idealists* want the results of that movement. The Survivalist* will be more likely to SABOTAGE the movement just to keep the social aspects of it going. For instance, the Survivalist* feminists will create discord between men and women just to keep Feminism going well past its usefulness and original purpose. (Not to say all Feminism in all of its forms all around the world has already served its purpose, but there are women who are looking for a fight simply to keep the social aspects, the bond between the social group going and creating more problems just to keep the unity in the war against men going.)

the Idealists* simply want the results, and once the results have been achieved, they want to exit the group and focus on their PERSONAL lives instead. They only see a problem to be rectified, and the social aspects are a necessary evil they need to tolerate while fixing the problem. Once the problem is gone, they can leave – and this is when the Survivalist* will create a problem if there wasn’t any, to lure the parting the Idealists* back to fold… Like it was the Survivalist*’s DUTY to do so. That is why the Survivalist* will always sabotage the very cause they’re sworn to work for. A Survivalist* will disturb world peace just to have the social experience of working to restore world peace. They are the fireman who starts a fire just to be able to band together with the other fireys to put out the fire once more.

Both the Survivalist* and the Idealists* want to have a family

Even though both the Survivalist* and the Idealists* want to have a family, they don’t, again, see it the same way. The Survivalist* want to raise children that will never leave the family unit, they raise children to continue in the footsteps of their parents, and the Survivalist* children want nothing more than to fulfill their parent’s dreams.

the Idealists* raise a family of achievers – if they get their way. They want their children to be happy and contented in their own lives. They want a family that supports each individual in the family, rather than a family in which each member sacrifices their own dreams to the needs of the family. The Idealists* want parents and want to be parents that will help their offspring onto their wings and do whatever great things they are capable of, and love their children as individuals, rather than wheels of a cart.

As far as family goes, the best parents can see the needs of a child and adapt accordingly, provide a ready-made paved path for the Survivalist* child and help a Idealists* child to spread his or her wings and fly – but only a Idealists* is evolved enough to be capable of doing this.

the Idealists* are, however, more than capable of saying no to the whole raising a family thing, but they will still seek for a family that they choose for themselves, among other adults and people they respect. They may also turn to “parenting the whole world” rather than focusing only blood relatives.

Both the Survivalist* and the Idealists* may seem eager to have sex

Both types may seem quite eager to have sex. However, the Survivalist* women, in particular, will dress up sexy and looking eager to tell men they are willing to “do their part” in turn for protection, safety, and a little love and care. The Idealists* women who are openly sexual, are that because they’ve gotten tired of being lumped together with sex-negative women, and they want to make it clear they won’t agree to be ignored as sexual partners as a favor to them.

Both types, obviously, within each group, have a different attitude toward sex, but if they seem obviously “begging for it”, they are doing it for different reasons.

Subscribe to get a Daily Message