A dress code should not be needed. It SHOULD NOT, but it is. People dress up in certain ways to convey a message, and the less we have codes, the harder it is to express oneself through a coded message in a dress. Back in the victorian times, a naughty girl could get a man aroused by showing him her angle. Now, a girl with no intent of having sexual relations with anyone can walk around half naked with no fear of sexual attention. That’s simply BORING.

I hate it. I put on a short skirt and men are supposed to look away like they don’t know what it means? Bah! There are women out there who wear the most sexually provocative outfit they can find just to bait men into making a sexual suggestion that they can slam down feeling all superior about it. I believe men have some rights, too, and one of them is to get sexually turned on by a half-naked woman who pretends to be clueless about what she’s wearing. We all know she knows what she’s doing, and if she doesn’t know, she’d better get educated, fast, and most preferably by other women who tell her that she’s sending a sexual signal and if she doesn’t want to send a sexual signal, she’d better go change.

Why no dress code is oppressive toward men

I hate the culture that we live in. Men are being shoved to the sidelines, forced to be ashamed of every natural response they have on freaking anything, something angers them, they can’t shout because that would make them “aggressive” women, on the other hand, can scream and carry on all they want, and all we are allowed to say is: “oh a strong, independent woman.” A bitch, would be a more appropriate term, “hormonal”, or “out of control” apply many times, too. Not to say women cannot get angry and have every right to be angry and express their emotions, but when all control is lost and nothing carries no weight anymore… Is it no wonder people fly off the handle if NOTHING they do is seen obnoxious or even meaningful?

How can a woman ruffle feathers these days? Then again, Cyrus, Minaj, and the Kardashians manage to do it, but I don’t quite know how. They still get paid. They still have their fans. What do they admire? Is Cyrus a feminist hero with no regard to men and their opinions? Minaj, what is she? An openly lesbian woman who cannot keep her alignments hidden while still flaunting what she’s got to men? (I actually know nothing about these people.) The Kardashians on the other hand… I know why they are irritating. They are classy women who nobody likes to like, but we still do, they are gorgeous, sensual, and men like them, what’s there not to hate? Men don’t want to admit to wanting Kim and women don’t like to admit to being threatened. (Of course, I never watched the show, so I don’t know the level of their conversation which, I presume, is the source of the irritation. I don’t think I’ve ever heard one of them utter a word, so…) However, as far as their look goes… They are more often than not, just dressed RIGHT. They know exactly what they are doing and they know exactly what signal they put out there with their choices of see-through outfits.

Normy dress code to bond with women

I hate this female-alliance thing, too. Why am I supposed to like all women simply because we’re all women? Men are not expected to like each other because they’re all men. They maybe expected to not punch each other in the face at a garden party (but oh if they would!!) but they are not required to always take the side of another man just because they’re men – but instead, they’re supposed to take the side of a woman, even if every single one of them knows the woman is rotten to the core. Women are supposed to blind themselves of the same insight, because… Hell, the world has never seen such a wonder as a manipulative female!

So women have to be given all the freedom in the world with no limitations. Whatever they want. Whenever they want it, whichever way they want it, apart from when a woman wants something different to other women; if that’s the case, she has no rights. She must be silenced. And that goes to the dress code. Whenever someone is trying to mildly say that short dresses have no place at a high school, they are blamed for I don’t know… Whatever they decide to blame them on. But seriously, short dresses do not have a place at a high school, and the fact is that even if some girls were completely innocent about the implications of a short skirt, there will be others who know full well what they are wearing and why. So should we just tell the innocent girls to wear their short skirts when they haven’t got the instinct developed to tell when a guy is reacting to their dress in a way that she doesn’t know how to handle, or should we, perhaps, allow the know-full-well-what-they-are-doing girls dress that way in high school, because, hell, seducing a teacher is all ok? (I don’t know, I would be quite cool with that, remembering my own school years, my music teacher was rather hot and I tried to hit on him as much as I could, sans a short skirt…)

Why return of a dress code can be a feminist issue

I say the message should be clear. Provocative outfits are called that for a reason. If you do not want to provoke a sexual response, do not fucking wear that stuff. If you want to irritate and bait men with them, don’t be surprised if you get a response from them in perfect alignment to your intent.

Women are not stupid children who should get away with anything at all. We know what we are doing, and men do not need to treat us like we were innocent silly children running around in a diaper! Women NEED TO BE accountable for their own actions. Has gone on for long enough. How is a man supposed to know when a come on is a come on and when it is simply baiting them, either for the pleasure of slapping them across the face or worse, sue them for everything they’ve got on the basis of “sexual harassment” or what not, all under the presumption that men are supposed to be mind-readers and the guardian of a grown woman who they don’t even necessarily know. (And grown people have the freaking right to assume other grown up people want heterosexual sex, sometimes with strangers.) It is not cool that in 2016 ALL MEN are expected to be guardians of ALL WOMEN, and react to all women as if they were completely unaware of their own actions. That is a Victorian era attitude rehashed.

When the feminists demanded women the right to wear anything they wanted, they didn’t mean that it should be interpreted as a requirement for men to think they are not sexual. The original dismantling of the dress code was simply to liberate sexual women to be able to express their sexuality without getting kicked out of their job or their school if they wore a short skirt during their free time. The point was for the women to be able to be openly sexual, but  now this is used in a way to test men on whether or not they see a woman as a sex object if she’s dressed like one… And that is stupid. I would prefer a tight dress code that can be broken with an open top button to the idea that women can walk around half naked and be considered “non-sexual”.

This is not cool. Rational women are suffering from men’s fear of women, these women give us all a bad name.

Subscribe to get a Daily Message