Why men believe that women want money, power, and status out of a relationship.

Intelligent men have a few things in common: The ability to acquire wealth and a tendency to try and understand and structure their environment and teach others what they’ve learned. However, no matter how intelligent you are, you are largely limited to your observation of things. We tend not to meet a whole lot of smart people who we trust to contradict our own view of the world, and therefore, the experience of what women want is based on the experiences of a man, not the experience of a woman… The normally expressed view is also not based on the experience base of a high, but not top-level man, who is getting on amazingly well with women. They are dating a little above their own league, making smart men think they must have hidden abilities with women. While this view is accurate regarding a section of women, it completely ignores one important group: heterosexual women.

My claim seems outlandish, I know. However, hear me out.

Young straight women think they’re in a good position… as they should be.

Heterosexual women are not worried about their capacity to find love in this world. They are not in a hurry, and they certainly don’t think they need to compete over men – they believe in true love because they feel true love toward men. Women who believe themselves to be straight but whose true sexual orientation is lesbian or strongly lesbian bisexual, do not feel natural love toward men. Instead, they feel an urgency to strike the best deal possible, acquiring a favorable marriage before all the good ones are gone. Heterosexual women don’t think men are “good ones” or “bad; they’rehey’re just men who they either love or don’t love – on a personal level.

Young attr, active heterosexual women believe they are in a perfect position to find true love. They are sexually competent and comfortable, they are intelligent, they are beautiful, and they have a natural passion for men, who respect them and admire them. What’s there to worry about? So they ignore the threat: women who want to convince men that what women want is security, status, power, and as little sex as possible inside marriage. Women who simply wish to gain a position in society through marriage are going to work double time to make a man feel that they are worth true love, that they are sexy, and wanted for who they are as individuals, rather than what they can provide. Women with less to give GAIN from men’s lowered expectations. It will also serve as a blockage for the heterosexual women with a lot to give: they can be made seem “unnatural”, “better at pretending”, and “slutty” by the female who doesn’t want men to consider they’d be better off with the woman he feels natural attraction for. So they convince a smart man with logic that sounds smart… and is, but it’s also not true.

Men have learned that female interest looks like the interest of Narnian women.

Heterosexual women react to men in a different way than… The Narnian women – women so deep in the lesbian closet they don’t realize they’ve come out the other side; Narnia. The name came out as a joke, but heck, let’s use it, considering Lesbian also refers to a legend. Anyway. Narnians are self-confident, abrasive, selfish, entitled, and controlling of a man and his desires. The reason is that they are not playing the game with their heart involved. They are not worried about rejection, because they react to men as “a catch”, a game they play. Heterosexual women don’t play the game this way; they approach a man with a conversation, getting to know them, not getting to control them. Many men don’t even understand what she’s doing and believe themselves to have been friend-zoned simply because she’s not declaring him to belong to her now. The Narnians don’t see the true worth and freedom of choice that the heterosexual women feel a man has, and while the heterosexual woman is waiting for the man to express his interest toward her, too, the Narnian will swoop in and catch the guy – by simply INFORMING HIM, he’s now spoken for.

Heterosexual women in their mid-to-late 20s will fall into over-confidence once again.

The heterosexual woman can also be over-confident in the man’s ability to see how he’s with a woman half her own worth sexually speaking. A heterosexual woman can see all the things this woman is NOT WILLING to do for the guy she wants, so she’s not terribly worried that this relationship of his might be long-lasting, so she’s waiting for it to come to a natural end when he realizes this woman is not very much fun to be with. But men in this position are not EXPECTING fun, they expect to be given a list of demands the length of an arm, a list that the heterosexual woman will never give them, as it would never OCCUR to a heterosexual to think that she is in any position to make any more demands as he would be. And again, the heterosexual woman puts out the vibe that she’s not seriously interested in him but is simply playing games with him.

In other words; a man does not believe a woman of status is interested in him unless she’s counting his money as if it was her own.

Eventually, as she approaches 30, she decides that men of that type are simply too good for her, or she’s been unexpectedly unlucky in love. She won’t scream bloody murder for the lost funds and status she didn’t gain from a man of her worth, or how all men are pigs because she’s not wed yet, but figures she’s simply been unlucky in love and that men that she was interested in somehow just slipped through her fingers. She’ll marry a man from beneath him, as he sees a good deal and goes for it, and she feels this is about the best she can do, and she accepts her fate with as much stoicism as the men who accepted their fate of being a provider, not the object of devoted love and admiration.

Heterosexual women also fall into a final trap: Thinking they’re special.

Lastly, heterosexual women are naturally LOVED by men. They give them much more than the Narnians do, and they are more natural with the men and are more fun to be with. And, being used to the Narnian treatment, men will shower her with compliments, tell her she is amazing and unique and a God’s gift to mankind, and she will damned well listen. Her ego loves to think she’s the exception to the rule, that she’s one in a million by her love of men, and DO NOT hesitate to join a frustrated man in the joy of bashing other women – but she is… As the ONLY woman of this kind… Unique, and as such, not enough to marry every man that wants her, and the men know this.

The solution to a big sum of this problem is polyandry, (polygyny, and polygynandry) by the way, as monogamy is also another Narnian plot if you ask me. After all, what Narnian woman would want MORE sexual attention to herself if she can limit her duties to one productive man – after all, she isn’t greedy, she just wants a level of security in this world. And, if she also had to compete with the number of men she can attract, she’d quickly fall back in the competition for respect from her true loves; other women.

However, this trap of monogamy combined with somewhat heterosexual female blindness toward other women that she has no natural interest in, a heterosexual woman thinks she’s unique, that one Unicorn in the mass of terrible options, but as rare and unseen as she may be, she’s not the only one.

The Narnian woman looks different from different countries, too.

You’d also find that this gold-digging female type is not nearly as common and “biological” if you go, say, to Scandinavia (where I’m from) and have a look. It’s still there, but it is not as linked to wealth, money, and power, but more to fulfill the expected life narrative: get a job, find a husband, have children, and then have grandchildren. The focus on money and status is less prominent than, for example, in America, but the Narnian woman still exists with her expectation to be made an honest woman, while maintaining the right to NOT be sexual with a man. Scandinavian Narnians will have a man believe his job is not as clearly that of a financial provider, but that of an existing non-playing character and a backdrop in the fantasy life of a Scandinavian Narnian.

Hop over to Russia and the former Russian states of Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia, and the focus on money, power, and wealth jumps up again, but with a lot stronger emphasis on her duty to look like a full 10 to qualify as a trophy wife or a well-kept lover, a position that most Scandinavian women do not want, as they’d lose the respect of the fellow female; a trade-off they are not willing to make for financial gain.

What the Narnian women should see about themselves?

If a person’s sexual orientation is asexual, lesbian, or deeply lesbian bisexual, the obvious answer to this dilemma is a non-sexual female collective or polygyny as a solution. I wouldn’t advise a security-driven woman to rely on a monogamous partnership with another woman, but rather a group marriage or a group collective – and I am sure the right type of arrangement made your heart light up as a thought. 🙂

However, do NOT mix heterosexual or truly bisexual women into this collective. First of all, they don’t want to be in it, and secondly, they’ll cause drama being bored with the company of too many women and will want to involve a man in the mix.

Subscribe to get a Daily Message